For Reviewers

Peer Review

For Reviewers

The Journal of Digital Health and Advanced Biomaterials (JDHAB) welcomes qualified researchers to contribute to independent, constructive and evidence-based peer review, supporting scientific rigor, research integrity and responsible editorial decision-making.

Scientific Expertise Subject Knowledge · Methodological Rigor · Evidence-Based Assessment
Editorial Independence Impartiality · Competing Interests · Confidentiality
Research Integrity Constructive Feedback · Responsible Review · Editorial Accountability
Editorial Foundation

The Role of Peer Review

Peer review is an essential component of JDHAB's editorial process. Qualified reviewers provide independent scholarly assessments that support the scientific quality, clarity, transparency and reliability of submitted work.

Reviewers evaluate the contribution of a manuscript, the appropriateness of its methods, the interpretation of findings and the consistency between evidence and conclusions. Their recommendations inform editorial decisions; final decisions remain the responsibility of the journal's editors.

Reviewer Standards

Responsibilities and Integrity

JDHAB expects reviewers to conduct assessments with scientific competence, professional respect and independence. Reviewers should accept invitations only when they have relevant expertise and sufficient availability.

Scientific Competence Evaluate the manuscript within the limits of one's expertise, with attention to methodology, evidence and reporting quality.
Independence and Transparency Disclose actual or potential competing interests, including relevant institutional, professional, financial or personal relationships.
Confidentiality Protect unpublished manuscripts, research information and editorial correspondence. Do not disclose confidential material to unauthorized persons or external AI services.
Constructive Evaluation Provide respectful, specific and evidence-based comments, identifying strengths, limitations and revisions where appropriate.
Editorial Workflow

Review Invitations

Reviewers are invited according to the subject of the manuscript, their scientific expertise, independence, availability and the journal's editorial requirements.

Invitations may be accepted or declined through OJS. Upon acceptance, reviewers receive access to the relevant manuscript materials, review instructions and evaluation form.

Participation in the editorial or advisory structure of JDHAB does not automatically prevent an individual from serving as a reviewer. Relevant affiliations and competing interests must be disclosed and evaluated by the responsible editor.

Join Our Reviewer Community

Become a Scientific Reviewer

Researchers who wish to contribute to the international peer-review community of JDHAB are invited to register through the journal's official editorial platform.

During registration, please select: "Yes, I would like to be contacted with requests to review submissions to this journal."

Register as a Reviewer →

Registration indicates interest in receiving review invitations. It does not guarantee reviewer selection or assignment.

Reviewer information maintained by the Journal of Digital Health and Advanced Biomaterials (JDHAB). Reviewer invitations and assignments are managed through the journal's editorial system.