Confirm Journal Scope
Verify that the manuscript fits JDHAB’s scope in digital health, advanced biomaterials, biomedical technologies, imaging, artificial intelligence, clinical measurement, validation, or translational scientific workflows.
A practical guide for preparing complete, transparent, technically consistent, and submission-ready manuscripts for the Journal of Digital Health and Advanced Biomaterials — JDHAB.
This guide should be used together with the official JDHAB manuscript template, the Instructions for Authors, the Article Types and Limits page, and the journal’s Publication Ethics policy.
Authors remain responsible for the scientific accuracy, methodological transparency, ethical compliance, authorship information, references, tables, figures, declarations, and supplementary files included in the submission.
Prepare the manuscript directly in the official template corresponding to the selected article type.
Verify that the manuscript fits JDHAB’s scope in digital health, advanced biomaterials, biomedical technologies, imaging, artificial intelligence, clinical measurement, validation, or translational scientific workflows.
Choose the correct manuscript category and confirm its limits for word count, abstract length, figures, tables, supplementary material, and references.
Use the official template corresponding exactly to Original Research, Review Article, Methods and Validation, or Case Report / Case Series.
Insert the scientific content, metadata, declarations, references, tables, figures, captions, and supplementary information in the appropriate sections.
When double-anonymized review applies, prepare a blinded version derived from the same official template and remove identifying information.
Remove all instructional text and unused placeholders, verify consistency among files, and complete the final submission-readiness checklist.
Each article type has a distinct scientific structure. Authors should not use a generic Word document or adapt a template intended for another category.
For clinical, laboratory, observational, experimental, computational, diagnostic, and other original investigations.
For systematic, scoping, narrative, critical, integrative, and other evidence-synthesis manuscripts.
For methodological studies, validation studies, technical reports, software, protocols, reproducibility studies, and digital workflows.
For clinically relevant individual cases or case series with appropriate documentation, consent, analysis, and follow-up.
Manuscripts must be written in clear, formal, and scientifically precise English. Authors are responsible for linguistic accuracy and consistency of terminology.
Submit the main manuscript as an editable Microsoft Word file. Do not submit a PDF as the only manuscript file.
Retain all required headings and sections. Optional sections may be removed only when they are not applicable to the study design.
Remove all guidance, explanatory notes, examples, brackets, and unused placeholders before uploading the final manuscript.
Define non-standard abbreviations at first use and apply them consistently throughout the abstract, main text, tables, figures, and supplementary material.
Use internationally recognized measurement units, standardized scientific terminology, generic names, and accepted taxonomic or technical nomenclature.
Use a concise, informative, and scientifically accurate title. Identify the study design when this improves transparency or is required by the applicable reporting guideline.
Provide each author’s full name, academic degree, institutional affiliation, and ORCID iD. The author order must be agreed upon before submission.
List the department, institution, city, state or region when applicable, and country. Use numbered affiliations when authors are associated with different institutions.
Provide the full name, institutional email address, and complete postal address of the author responsible for editorial correspondence.
Follow the headings and organization provided in the selected manuscript template. The abstract must accurately reflect the objective, methods, principal findings, and conclusion.
When applicable, report the principal numerical findings, effect estimates, precision measures, diagnostic performance, agreement indices, or relevant adverse outcomes.
The abstract conclusion must be directly supported by the reported findings and must not exaggerate causality, clinical relevance, superiority, or generalizability.
Provide specific keywords that support discovery and indexing. Prefer recognized controlled vocabulary, including MeSH terminology when appropriate.
Define the scientific problem, summarize the relevant evidence, identify the unresolved gap, and end with a precise objective or research question.
Provide sufficient information for critical appraisal and independent reproduction. Describe design, setting, participants or specimens, variables, procedures, outcomes, sample-size rationale, and statistical analysis.
Present findings in a logical sequence corresponding to the Methods. Report participant or specimen flow, missing data, numerical estimates, uncertainty, adverse events, and protocol deviations when applicable.
Interpret the principal findings in relation to the research question, existing evidence, strengths, limitations, clinical or technical implications, and future research.
Provide a concise answer to the stated objective. Avoid introducing new results or making claims that exceed the evidence presented.
Follow the applicable EQUATOR Network reporting guideline and submit the completed checklist when required.
Tables must be editable, self-explanatory, consecutively numbered, and cited in the main text. Avoid submitting tables as screenshots or flattened images.
Use a concise title and define all abbreviations, statistical symbols, tests, units, and relevant explanatory information in the table notes.
Figures must be legible, consecutively numbered, cited in the text, and suitable for publication. Supply separate high-resolution files during submission when required.
Legends must allow independent interpretation and explain panels, symbols, abbreviations, measurement scales, annotations, and image modifications.
Remove identifying information and obtain written consent for publication whenever a person may be recognized directly or indirectly.
Do not perform selective enhancement, deletion, duplication, inappropriate contrast adjustment, or any modification that could misrepresent the original data.
References must follow Vancouver style according to the ICMJE Recommendations and the National Library of Medicine’s Citing Medicine.
Number references consecutively according to their first appearance in the manuscript. Reuse the original number when the same source is cited again.
Use official NLM journal abbreviations whenever available. Article titles should be presented in sentence case.
Include the DOI whenever available and verify that every citation corresponds accurately to an item in the reference list.
State the approving institution, committee name, approval number, and relevant ethical framework, or explain why formal approval was not required.
State whether informed consent was obtained from participants or legally authorized representatives when applicable.
Provide a specific statement when identifiable clinical information, images, recordings, or case details are included.
Disclose all financial, professional, institutional, intellectual, or personal relationships that could influence the work.
Identify all funding sources, grant numbers, and the role of the funder in study design, analysis, interpretation, or publication.
Describe individual contributions transparently using the CRediT taxonomy when appropriate.
State where supporting data, code, protocols, models, or analytical materials are available and specify any justified access restrictions.
Disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence or automated tools in writing, analysis, image processing, translation, or other relevant stages of the work.
Remove author names, affiliations, email addresses, ORCID iDs, acknowledgments, institutional identifiers, and other details that could reveal authorship.
Retain the complete manuscript structure, abstract, main text, references, tables, figures, captions, and non-identifying declarations.
Write self-citations in the third person and do not remove references that are scientifically necessary unless instructed by the editorial office.
Inspect document properties, tracked changes, comments, filenames, embedded metadata, and image information for identifying content.
Editable Word document prepared with the appropriate official template.
Double-anonymized version when required by the journal’s review workflow.
Separate publication-quality files with consistent numbering and captions.
Additional methods, protocols, datasets, tables, figures, checklists, or multimedia files when applicable.
Completed reporting-guideline checklist and flow diagram when required.
Documentation for reused material, identifiable information, or third-party copyrighted content when applicable.
The manuscript uses the official template corresponding to the selected article type.
All required sections, metadata, declarations, tables, figures, and references are present.
All instructional text, brackets, examples, and unused placeholders have been removed.
Titles, author information, numbering, captions, declarations, and filenames are consistent across all submission files.
Every in-text citation corresponds to the reference list, and each reference has been checked for accuracy.
All ethical approvals, consent statements, disclosures, and permissions have been included when applicable.
Select and download the official template corresponding to the intended article type.
Review the complete editorial, scientific, technical, ethical, and formatting requirements.
Confirm the accepted categories and the technical limits for each manuscript type.
Review authorship, originality, consent, conflicts, research integrity, data, and artificial intelligence policies.
Understand editorial assessment, double-anonymized peer review, independent handling, and editorial decisions.
Proceed to the submission portal after completing the manuscript and final checklist.
A manuscript is ready for submission only when it uses the correct official JDHAB template, follows the selected article-type limits, includes all required declarations, presents complete and verifiable references, and contains no remaining instructional text or unused placeholders.